Re: samba & ldap | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Charles Marcus escreveu:
On 5/15/2008 3:40 AM, Esteban Torres Rodriguez wrote:I'm new here and I have a doubt... I'm work with windows 2003 server and now i would change to llnux. My doubt regards the share of my server: to authenticate my users what is better: samba tdb or ldap? For us is not necessary an active directory, domain, ecc... I needonly a file server and I have arounud 400 users...Anyone have experience? Any suggestions?always ldap.Not necessarily... tdb is *very* fast and reliable, much simpler to set up and maintain, and if you don't *need* all the bells and whistles of ldap (high availability, SSO, etc), tdb is the better choice - at least in my opinion...
Depends of what is needed, in my opinion if an user must have the same password in samba AND any other service, use LDAP.
Regards. Edmundo Valle Neto -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Linux] [Info Cyrus] [LARTC] [Christmas Music] [Bugtraq] [Netfilter] [RAID] [Yosemite News] [Photography]
|
![]() |