Re: samba & ldap | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On 5/15/2008 3:40 AM, Esteban Torres Rodriguez wrote: >> I'm new here and I have a doubt... I'm work with windows 2003 server >> and now i would change to llnux. My doubt regards the share of my >> server: to authenticate my users what is better: samba tdb or ldap? >> For us is not necessary an active directory, domain, ecc... I need >> only a file server and I have arounud 400 users...Anyone have >> experience? Any suggestions? > always ldap. Not necessarily... tdb is *very* fast and reliable, much simpler to set up and maintain, and if you don't *need* all the bells and whistles of ldap (high availability, SSO, etc), tdb is the better choice - at least in my opinion... -- Best regards, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Linux] [Info Cyrus] [LARTC] [Christmas Music] [Bugtraq] [Netfilter] [RAID] [Yosemite News] [Photography]
|
![]() |