Re: About s3fs in samba4

[Gémes Géza <geza@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

2012-08-17 17:31 keltezéssel, felix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx írta:
> Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is
> set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs
> later, right?
> So I have a couple of questions:
>
> - What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations?
> - If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change GPOs
> later, should I select ntvfs???
>
> Best regards,
> Felix
If you use s3fs, the only thing you may need to do (first test if it is 
still necessary it was with the git version a week ago) is to give group 
Domain Admins, full access to the sysvol share (and recursively all 
subfolders) from a Windows domain member computer (loged in of course as 
a member of the Domain Admins group).
The major problem with ntvfs is that it isn't actively developed anymore 
and hasn't received those protocol dialect updates (smb2-3) which were 
introduced in Vista and 7, and thus it may have compatibility problems 
later (no known problem exist so far)

Regards

Geza Gemes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba