Re: Samba 4 provisioning error on Ubuntu 12.04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/06/12 10:16, steve wrote:
On 06/21/2012 10:24 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 21/06/12 07:42, steve wrote:
On 06/21/2012 08:27 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 14:17 -0700, todd kman wrote:
Let's start from the top: - Is libacl-dev1 installed on your system?
** I think that should be:
libacl1-dev

Here is the fstab entry on a working 12.04:
UUID=f99d4f08-6123-4941-8ee2-a260d22ddce5 / ext4 errors=remount-ro,acl,user_xattr 0 1

HTH
Steve

Hmm, this is interesting, this is what I have in my /etc/fstab on Ubuntu 12.04 server

# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
# / was on /dev/sda1 during installation
UUID=63c10807-be9a-4aed-bf2f-fa52e53fc162 / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1
# /home was on /dev/sda6 during installation
UUID=3826e336-978b-43e6-b02f-83694b132ed3 /home ext4 defaults 0 2

cat /proc/mounts
Shows:
/dev/disk/by-uuid/63c10807-be9a-4aed-bf2f-fa52e53fc162 / ext4 rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sda6 /home ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0

This passes the acl test on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO even though acl is not mentioned (it is installed) and Samba4 from git compiles and installs ok. Do I need to add acl to my /etc/fstab lines? user_xattr seems to be a default setting.

Rowland


Hi Rowland
My Samba4 is installed at /usr/local/bin on the / partition of the disk so I added acl,user_xattr to the / line in fstab and rebuilt with libacl1-dev installed, having read a post on the Ubuntu forum. Before this, I had the same s3fs error when provisioning.

/proc/mounts here gives the same output as yours so It looks as if the acl parameter is not needed, but no harm in trying. Are you able to reboot if you change fstab? If my memory server me correctly, remounting didn't work.

Sorry can't be more positive.
Cheers,
Steve

Well, I could try adding acl to the relevant /etc/fstab lines but as I said Samba4 compiled, installed & provisioned without complaining about it being missing. The acl test from the howto was passed on the relevant partitions, so I am wondering if I do need to alter my /etc/fstab. Is there anybody out there, with more knowledge than me, who can confirm one way or the other?

Rowland

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Index of Archives]     [Info Cyrus]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Netfilter]     [RAID]     [Trinity TED Users]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux