Seems resonable, zfsacl stores the ACE's natively compared to acl_xattr that makes use of extended attributes. It seems that the big players (Oracle, IBM) made their own tools. Any idea of the strict mapping completeness among zfsacl and acl_xattr ? Is samba4 any breakthrough regarding this issue ? Dragos On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jonathan Buzzard <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 12:34 +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote: > > Thanks Jonathan, > > > > > > I missed that. > > > > > > So, zfsacl is provided by Oracle. > > > > I have no idea as I don't use Solaris > > > > Should I favor acl_xattr besides zfsacl ? > > > > I would have thought that zfsacl which stores the ACL's as native NFSv4 > ACL's would be preferable. My personal experience is with vfs_gpfs and > GPFS to store the Windows ACL's as native NFSv4 ACL's in GPFS. > > JAB. > > -- > Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk > Fife, United Kingdom. > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Linux] [Info Cyrus] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Netfilter] [Internet Dating Forums] [RAID] [Yosemite News] [Photography]
|
|