Re: Solaris 11 ZFS - acl_xattr still needed ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 12:34 +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote:
> Thanks Jonathan,
> 
> 
> I missed that.
> 
> 
> So, zfsacl is provided by Oracle.
> 

I have no idea as I don't use Solaris

> 
> Should I favor acl_xattr besides zfsacl ?
> 

I would have thought that zfsacl which stores the ACL's as native NFSv4
ACL's would be preferable. My personal experience is with vfs_gpfs and
GPFS to store the Windows ACL's as native NFSv4 ACL's in GPFS.

JAB.

-- 
Jonathan A. Buzzard                 Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
Fife, United Kingdom.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Linux]     [Info Cyrus]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Netfilter]     [Internet Dating Forums]     [RAID]     [Yosemite News]     [Photography]

Add to Google Powered by Linux