Re: Samba compilation issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Smbd -i gives interactive output. It is referring to /usr/local. Not sure why.

bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -i -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
creating lame upcase table
creating lame lowcase table
Unable to setup corepath for smbd: No such file or directory
smbd version 3.4.2 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2009
Failed to load /usr/local/samba/lib/valid.dat - No such file or directory
creating default valid table
tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: could not open file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/messages.tdb: No such file or directory
ERROR: Failed to initialise messages database: No such file or directory
messaging_tdb_init failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
Could not init smbd messaging context.


I tried this option to reinstall since it was not showing in pkginfo. I think I am messing up things.

bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep samba
system      SUNWsmbaS                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source)
system      SUNWsmbac                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client)
system      SUNWsmbar                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root)
system      SUNWsmbau                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr)
bash-3.2# mv /opt/usr/local/samba/ /opt/usr/local/samba-error
bash-3.2# mv /opt/var/sadm/pkg/SMCsamba /opt/var/sadm/pkg/SMCsamba.tmp
bash-3.2# pkgadd -R /opt -d samba-3.4.2-sol10-sparc-local
Processing package instance <SMCsamba> from </var/tmp/samba-3.4.2-sol10-sparc-local>
The following files are already installed on the system and are being
used by another package:
  /opt/usr/local/samba/bin/
....
Installation of <SMCsamba.tmp> was successful

bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep  SMCsamba
bash-3.2# pkginfo |grep  samba
system      SUNWsmbaS                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source)
system      SUNWsmbac                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client)
system      SUNWsmbar                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root)
system      SUNWsmbau                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr)

From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:33 PM
To: Murugan, Prabu
Cc: samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue

I don't know if installing Samba in an alternate path could cause an issue with dependencies.  But It doesn't seem like it.    If "smbd -V" works then I would think this is not an issue.     So it The "testparm -v " command should also let you verify that the password file, private directory, and locks directory are correct.     You may also want to increase the log level to 10 to see if samba will tell you why it is quitting.       Or maybe run the "/opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -F -d 10" command.    You may also want to try running "truss /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd" to see if that shows you anything.

Does /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/nmbd  or /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/winbind run ?



From: prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx [mailto:prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:32 AM
To: gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue

When we install as a package we do it under /opt and compilation under /usr/local.
Log directory (/opt/usr/local/samba/log) is empty :(. /var/samba/log contains logs for oracle samba.
These are standalone servers. hardware is Sunfire V490.

Created softlink to gnu ld file. Still same error.
Not sure why libtalloc is still considered when we run "./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no".
Am I missing something here?

Thanks,
Prabu

From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:42 PM
To: Murugan, Prabu
Cc: samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue


When you installed samba did you specify an alternate path?  I don't understand why it is in /opt/usr/local....

Since you can at least run it with -V, it  indicates that the binary and the library paths are good.  You may want to look at your samba log files (/var/samba/logs and /var/log/samba )   to see if there is some other issue - maybe with your config files, local cache or locks, or local db files.



gcc will be harddwired to use /usr/ccs/bin/ld.

You can try the following
    #mv /usr/ccs/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld.bak
    #ln -s /usr/local/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld

This is not generally a good idea BUT it might help identify if your linker is a problem.



Are these standalone servers or domain members or domain controllers?


On 05/18/12 13:02, prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx<mailto:prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
smbd -V is showing the version.
bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V
Version 3.4.2

ld is picking from /usr/local/bin/ld
bash-3.2# which ld
/usr/local/bin/ld
bash-3.2# /usr/local/bin/ld --version
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.21.

I don't remember whether it gave error regarding dependencies while installing 3.4.2. But I installed all the dependencies as a prerequisite.

Thanks,
Prabu

From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:25 PM
To: Murugan, Prabu; Samba
Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue


your configure syntax looks correct

One major issue I ran into was the "ld" (linker) command.   Gcc on Solaris  (either from sun "freeware" tools cd or from www.sunfreeware.com<http://www.sunfreeware.com>) was built with /usr/ccs/bin/ld -  which is an old version.   A lot of software expects gnu ld or at least a newer version of ld.  I could sometimes force stuff by sym linking /usr/ccs/bin/ld to /usr/local/bin/ld  or /usr/sfw/bin/gld.


/opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V   didn't show any output?

Does "/usr/sbin/smbd -V"  show output (that would be the sun/oracle version.   Probably not relevant if it does work.)


When you installed samba from sunfreeware did it warn about any missing dependencies?





On 05/18/12 12:36, prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx<mailto:prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I ran
./configure --enable-external-libtalloc=no --with-libtalloc=no
Issue is same.
Above command is fine?

I compiled talloc 1.3.0. still make gives the same error. I have attached output of make errors.

Reinstalling 3.4.2   didn't help:(.

Thanks,
Prabu

From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 9:22 PM
To: Murugan, Prabu
Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue

Your configure options  (./configure --help) include


  --enable-external-libtalloc
                          Enable external talloc [default=auto]

      --with-libtalloc
                        Build the libtalloc shared library (default=yes if  shared libs supported)


You should be able to set to "=no"

Or try building talloc 1.3.x with Samba 3.4.x.

Do either of the following work?

    /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V
     /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b
     /opt/usr/local/samba/testparm -v  -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf


You may want to have /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/ at the beginning of your LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

You may want to reinstall the Sunfreeware version of samba 3.4.2  if you need to get samba up and running quickly on this machine.









On 05/18/12 10:31, prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx<mailto:prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes the 3.5.10 is from Sun/Oracle.

How to disable talloc while running ./configure?

Smbd -F doesn't give any error.
bash-3.2# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/opt/usr/local/samba/lib/
bash-3.2# /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -F -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
bash-3.2# ps -ef |grep smbd
    root  7201  7167   0 19:32:20 pts/1       0:00 grep smbd

bash-3.2# which pkg-config
/bin/pkg-config
bash-3.2# /bin/pkg-config --version
0.15.0

When I try to compile talloc-2.0.7. I get this error.

Waf: Entering directory `/usr/local/talloc-2.0.7/bin'
[15/28] Compiling lib/replace/test/testsuite.c
../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: error: syntax error before "torture_local_replace"
../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:52: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1058: error: syntax error before "torture_local_replace"
../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c: In function `torture_local_replace':
../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: `bool' undeclared (first use in this function)
../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: for each function it appears in.)
../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1060: error: syntax error before "ret"
../lib/replace/test/testsuite.c:1061: error: `ret' undeclared (first use in this function)
Waf: Leaving directory `/usr/local/talloc-2.0.7/bin'
Build failed:  -> task failed (err #1):
        {task: cc testsuite.c -> testsuite_3.o}
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all'

Thanks,
Prabu

From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 6:57 PM
To: Murugan, Prabu
Cc: samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue

This is a lot to keep track off.

So the 3.5.10 is from Sun/Oracle?

I see on sunfreeware.com that 3.4.2 is still their latest version.  But I thought it would have installed in /usr/local/.  If you moved renamed the directory, you may need to update your LD_LIBRARY_PATH.   You may want to try running smbd with "-F"  (foreground) instead of "-D"  and see if that provides more errors.

What does "which pkg-config" show on each machine?  I see there is a sunfreeware.com version of pkg-config.  The latest sun/oracle one is 0 .15 which the one one sunfreeware.com is 0.25.


FYI when I compile samba I will usually compile in /usr/local/samba-version.  Once I have it compiled I can delete or rename the previous version and then symlink /usr/local/samba to the new version.


Can you do "make talloc" from with in the samba source code directory to build, in advance, the talloc that is bundled in?    Or can you just disable talloc when you configure?  Although I would be interested if you then get warnings that tdb is unavailable.





On 05/18/12 08:52, prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx<mailto:prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I am on Sun SPARC system.
On the non-working machine default package is 3.5.10. Till now it was running with 3.4.2 (SMCsamba). Wrongly mentioned as 3.5.3.
I set "set ngroups_max=32" in /etc/system and rebooted.
Then installed gcc 3.4.6. few more lines added to the error.

./Configure Error:
bash-3.2# more config.err
configure: WARNING: $PATH contains /usr/ucb - build errors may follow
Package talloc was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `talloc.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'talloc' found
make: Warning: Ignoring DistributedMake -v option
make: Warning: Ignoring DistributedMake -o option
make: Fatal error: No dmake output dir argument after -o flag


Another issue is. Until we fix we are planning to use 3.4.2. It is also not starting now :(.
Command " ldd -r /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd" doesn't report any error.
bash-3.2# /etc/init.d/samba.server.opt start
BASE=/opt/usr/local/samba
+ [ ! -d /usr/bin ]
+ [ ! -d /opt/usr/local/samba/log ]
+ echo Starting SMBD
Starting SMBD
+ /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
+ echo Starting NMBD
Starting NMBD
+ /opt/usr/local/samba/sbin/nmbd -D -s /opt/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf


Thanks,
Prabu

From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 4:51 PM
To: Murugan, Prabu; samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue

http://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/  -  has talloc 1.3.x not 1.0.x (my mistake.)


For the non working machine -  which package are you using for 3.4.2?  SMCsamba is the package from Sunfreeware.com.    I am unclear if you non-working has 3.4.2 or 3.5.3.   SUNWsmb*  packages are from Sun/Oracle.

I am also guessing that on the working machine you have gcc from sunfreeware (based on the /usr/local path.)   Depending on how your LD_LIBRARY_PATH was set and which gcc you were using, the SMCsamba packages could have provided some required libraries when building software.   My guess is that samba 3.5.x uses a newer libtalloc than 3.4.x and that was causing some of the problems.    Although LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH should have let you specify the version you wanted.  I wonder if the "wrong" gcc isn't picking it up correctly-   so using the same gcc as the working machine may matter.


Are you on a  sparc or x86_64 system?   I believe that sunfreeware gcc on sparc compiles 64-bit by default but on x86_64 will compile 32-bit by default (even on a 64-bit machine.)


I still think the simplest thing is to just use the latest Sun/Oracle samba and skip compiling.  You should be able to download the Samba patches from Oracle without having to install the full patch cluster.

PS.   I noticed that samba 3.4.x and higher enforce the Solaris NGROUPS_MAX parameter.     You probably want to have set "ngroups_max=32" in /etc/system-  otherwise default is 16.  If you have the latest kernel patches (147440-10 or 147441-10 as of 2-3 months ago) you can set this even higher.





From: prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx<mailto:prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx> [mailto:prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx]>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:25 AM
To: gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx>; samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Samba compilation issue

Thanks a lot for your reply. I was going crazy because of this issue.

Let me answer your questions.
Can you cat talloc.pc-  make sure the config file shows the correct path.
>>>bash-3.2# more /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/talloc.pc
prefix=/usr/local/samba-extras
exec_prefix=${prefix}
libdir=${prefix}/lib
includedir=${prefix}/include
Name: talloc
Description: A hierarchical pool based memory system with destructors
Version: 2.0.7
Libs: -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/samba-extras/lib -L${libdir} -ltalloc
Cflags: -I${includedir}
URL: http://talloc.samba.org/

I wonder what the significant difference is between your two solaris 10 machines.  Which gcc are you using.  Do either of them have the sunfreeware versions of samba?  Or the sun bundled versions of samba.   Maybe one machine already has libtalloc installed.    What does "pkginfo | grep -i samba" show?  I think samba 3.0x. binaries from Sun/Oracle may have been in /usr/sfw/bin not /usr/bin.
>>>>On the working server /usr/local/bin/gcc version is 3.4.6. Here /bin/gcc is 3.4.3. path and version are different.
Non working machine
bash-3.2# pkginfo | grep -i samba
application SMCsamba                         samba ==> 3.5.3
system      SUNWsmbaS                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Source)
system      SUNWsmbac                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client)
system      SUNWsmbar                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root)
system      SUNWsmbau                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr)

Working machine
bash-3.00# pkginfo |grep samba
application SMCsamba                         samba   ==> 3.0.24
system      SUNWsmbac                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (client) ==>
system      SUNWsmbar                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Root)
system      SUNWsmbau                        samba - A Windows SMB/CIFS fileserver for UNIX (Usr)
system      samba                            SMB based file/printer sharing

What is the current version of samba you are running.  Did you compile that or is if from a package?  Is the current version in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH when compiling the new one?
>>>Working machine we were compiled samba 3.0.21b. now compiled 3.4.17. Non working machine current version 3.4.2(as package, not from source code) since 3.0.21b was not getting compiled.
Working machine OS is Solaris 10_update 5. Non-working machine is latest OS Solaris 10_update 10.

PS The samba 3.4.17 source code includes talloc.  But it might be 1.0.x  Maybe try downloading and compiling 1.0.x instead.       And I would try building it into the same directory that you are building the rest of samba.
>>>I don't see 1.0.x under http://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/. So I tried with 2.0.7.
bash-3.2# pwd
/usr/local/talloc-2.0.7
bash-3.2# ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba-3.4.17/source/

Is the current version in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH when compiling the new one?
>>>No they are not included in the new one.
bash-3.2# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/usr/local/samba-extras/lib/
bash-3.2# echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
/usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/

3.4.2 were under /usr/local/samba/. I moved as /usr/local/samba-3.4.2.

Thanks,
Prabu

From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.vandal@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 3:52 AM
To: Murugan, Prabu; Samba
Subject: Re: Samba compilation issue

On 05/17/12 18:18, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
On 05/17/12 11:15, prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx<mailto:prabu.murugan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
As a security concern we are upgrading samba to 3.4.17.
I tried all possible option to compile samba 3.4.17 on Solaris 10_U10. But it is not going through.

User requirement is to compile samba 3.4.17 to support their application. 3.4.17 is working on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10_U5. But not on Solaris 10_U10.
./configure and make gives error related to talloc. I have set the PKG_CONFIG_PATH. Still the error is same.

I tried the solution provided by you on URL http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-June/156711.html
Can you help me with this issue.

bash-3.2# pwd
/usr/local/samba-3.4.17/source3
bash-3.2# more config.err
Package talloc was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `talloc.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'talloc' found

bash-3.2# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/usr/local/samba-extras/lib/
bash-3.2# echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
/usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/

bash-3.2# ls -l /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/pkgconfig/
total 6
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root         334 May 16 19:13 pytalloc-util.pc
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root         324 May 16 19:13 talloc.pc
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root         277 May 16 19:17 tdb.pc

bash-3.2# ls -l /usr/local/samba-extras/lib/
total 188
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          25 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so -> libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          25 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so.2 -> libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        9412 May 16 19:14 libpytalloc-util.so.2.0.7
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          18 May 16 19:14 libtalloc.so -> libtalloc.so.2.0.7
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          18 May 16 19:14 libtalloc.so.2 -> libtalloc.so.2.0.7
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root       79556 May 16 19:14 libtalloc.so.2.0.7
drwxr-xr-x   2 root     root         512 May 16 19:19 pkgconfig
drwxr-xr-x   3 root     root         512 May 16 19:14 python2.6

Thanks,
Prabu

I see on  http://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/  that there is both talloc 1.3.x and talloc 2.0.x.    I am looking through some of my old builds and my old build notes.   With samba I seem to have compiled talloc 2.0.x separately (I have the pkgconfig files.)     I think samba 3.4.x I have just compiled with out talloc.


Can you cat talloc.pc-  make sure the config file shows the correct path.


I wonder what the significant difference is between your two solaris 10 machines.  Which gcc are you using.  Do either of them have the sunfreeware versions of samba?  Or the sun bundled versions of samba.   Maybe one machine already has libtalloc installed.    What does "pkginfo | grep -i samba" show?  I think samba 3.0x. binaries from Sun/Oracle may have been in /usr/sfw/bin not /usr/bin.

What is the current version of samba you are running.  Did you compile that or is if from a package?  Is the current version in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH when compiling the new one?




PS The samba 3.4.17 source code includes talloc.  But it might be 1.0.x  Maybe try downloading and compiling 1.0.x instead.       And I would try building it into the same directory that you are building the rest of samba.




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Linux]     [Info Cyrus]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Netfilter]     [Internet Dating Forums]     [RAID]     [Yosemite News]     [Photography]

Add to Google Powered by Linux