Re: [Bulk] 3.2.7 vs 3.5 locking logic/mechanism - locking denied to non-owners

[lejeczek <peljasz@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

if I level up the logs

on 3.5 : fetch_share_mode_unlocked: no share_mode record 
around (file not open)

on 3.2.7 : is_locked: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl 
start=1733591040 len=61440 unlocked for fnum 10659 file

any thoughts?


On 25/04/12 13:53, lejeczek wrote:
> hi everybody
>
> I'm hoping some experts could shed a bit more light on the 
> subject
> I cannot work it out and it's potentially quite a hassle
>
> win xp sp3 client
> samba 3.2.7 on sles 11
> samba 3.5.10 on rhel 6.1
>
> and one app the the front end to a user, that does not 
> write anything back to the resure
>
> this is what I think goes on:
> 3.5 somehow denies some sort of locking to the client if 
> the user does not own/write to data tree
> no such problem with 3.2
>
> I've compared runtime configs of both sambas and virtually 
> the look almost identical, well, where the differences are 
> they look unrelated to the issue, at least to me.
>
> does anybody have any suggestions? ideas?
> greatly appreciated
> thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba