Re: [PATCH RT 2/2 v4] preempt-rt/x86: Delay calling signals in int3

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 17:25 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/06, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> > > This is certainly wrong in upstream kernel. It does use force_
> > > this way although it shouldn't imho.
> >
> > It's wrong in upstream even with the #ifdef define here?
> 
> No, the patch has no effect if !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL.

Well then, it is perfectly correct for the upstream kernel with the
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL added ;-)

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable-rt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html