|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011, Ocampo Coronado, Francisco O wrote:
When the source code is not released, which is the best
field to put on ?Source RPM??
There is always a source RPM, even if you don't distribute it. "nosrc" means that the RPM was built from binaries, instead of compiled from source. However, there is still a "source" RPM, which would contain the tarball or whatever of binaries the RPM was built from. (For instance, mozilla builds of firefox can be packaged as RPMs - the nosrc.src.rpm contains the mozilla binary tarball.)
How can I avoid getting the %{name}-%{version}.src.rpm in my
?Source RPM? field?
You can't. I think your clients understand that the source must exist somewhere (or else they can't expect any updates or bug fixes).
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxx>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list