Re: Mem utilization on Red Hat 9 brain tickler.
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
No I think it just means you know more => have more to forget... I am also scratching my brain (I am old too) and I believe it is to do with kernel bigmem settings, run uname -a on both systems to see what they report. JohnR ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven W. Orr" <steveo@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: shrike <shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Mem utilization on Red Hat 9 brain tickler. Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:08:41 -0400 (EDT) > > I have two machines here that are each running with 2G of ram. One sees all of > its ram and the other only sees 256M. This is ringing a bell in the back of my > mind about how to fix it. I can't remember if there's a boot commandline > option that's needed or a special kernel-build trick that was needed or what > it was. Does anyone remember what the trick was? > > I hate getting old. :-( > > TIA > > -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have > .0. > happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 > Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 > individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? > steveo at syslang.net > > -- Shrike-list mailing list > Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
[Fedora Users] [Centos Users] [Kernel Development] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat Phoebe Beta] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Discussion] [Gimp] [Stuff] [Yosemite News]