Re: GTk installation?

[shane c branch <scbranch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

D. D. Brierton wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 23:31, Randy Kelsoe wrote:
>
>
> > He originally asked for GTk.so.
>
>
> Yeah, I noticed that reading back through the thread. Nevertheless, it
> seems odd that an IM client would require something provided by gtk-rep.
> I thought only sawfish used rep. So, reading between the lines I
> wondered whether he might mean libgtk.so instead.
i think it's strange too. for additional context, i'm attempting to 
reverse engineer our corporate linux image. it is based on rh9, but 
rather than just take the image with all the extra crap that i don't 
need or want, my goal is to load rh9, then add only the packages that i 
want.

the im client in question is called 'sanity'. as i understand it, it is 
supposed to be a version of lotus sametime.

they also have a rpm java version of sametime, but it is an ancient 
build, version 1.5. i have it working, but it has some hiccup, which i 
hoped 'sanity' would resolve.

--

regards,

shane


--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list