Re: doc iso

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anyone notice the US one is out of date? Am I right thinking the mirror
has not caught up yet?

On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 19:33, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> This got lost in the black hole of the ether ... try again.
> 
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:47:42 -0400 (EDT), William Hooper wrote
> > Mike Vanecek said:
> > > On 14 Apr 2003 14:45:21 +1000, Michael Wardle wrote
> > >> On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 13:56, R Sanchez wrote:
> > >> > I've downloaded redhat 9 iso's. I wanted the docs too but there are 3
> > >> iso in
> > >> > the directory. Which one should I download (i.e. what does each iso
> > >> > contain?).
> > >>
> > >> This has been answered at least twice on this list already:
> > >> https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/shrike-list/2003-April/001184.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Slightly different queation, but why is it that Redhat is not making
> > >
> > > shrike-docs-APAC.iso
> > > shrike-docs-EMEA.iso
> > > shrike-docs-US.iso
> > >
> > > available via paid RHN ISO downloads or at
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/9/en/iso/i386/?
> > >
> > > Best I can tell, one must go to a mirror site to find it/them.
> > >
> > 
> > I don't know anything about RHN availability, but aren't they 
> > available at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/9/en/iso/doc/
> > (I can't get there to find out)?
> 
> Finally got there and they are there.
> 
> > This is the directory structure for the mirrors
> > ftp://sunsite.dk/mirrors/redhat/9/en/iso/doc/
> > 
> > It stands to reason that the docs aren't i386 specific...
> 
> Thank you. Absolutely. 
> 
> Mike.
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux