Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: doc iso

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


This got lost in the black hole of the ether ... try again.

On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:47:42 -0400 (EDT), William Hooper wrote
> Mike Vanecek said:
> > On 14 Apr 2003 14:45:21 +1000, Michael Wardle wrote
> >> On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 13:56, R Sanchez wrote:
> >> > I've downloaded redhat 9 iso's. I wanted the docs too but there are 3
> >> iso in
> >> > the directory. Which one should I download (i.e. what does each iso
> >> > contain?).
> >>
> >> This has been answered at least twice on this list already:
> >> https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/shrike-list/2003-April/001184.html
> >
> >
> > Slightly different queation, but why is it that Redhat is not making
> >
> > shrike-docs-APAC.iso
> > shrike-docs-EMEA.iso
> > shrike-docs-US.iso
> >
> > available via paid RHN ISO downloads or at
> >
> > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/9/en/iso/i386/?
> >
> > Best I can tell, one must go to a mirror site to find it/them.
> >
> 
> I don't know anything about RHN availability, but aren't they 
> available at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/9/en/iso/doc/
> (I can't get there to find out)?

Finally got there and they are there.

> This is the directory structure for the mirrors
> ftp://sunsite.dk/mirrors/redhat/9/en/iso/doc/
> 
> It stands to reason that the docs aren't i386 specific...

Thank you. Absolutely. 

Mike.





[Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux