Re: Bugfix errata?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Mi, 2003-04-09 at 23:44, David Krider wrote: > Well, I, too, am sure that they will be fixing the really nasty ones, > but what about the stuff like the gkrellm thing I posted about? What > about Konqueror thing I posted about? They will probably NOT be fixed ( and I agree with this ). Red Hat's focus is the enterprise. Also, developers paid by Red Hat to work on GTK, GNOME are doing important new development, not fixing bugs after the final release have been shipped. If you prefer more bug fixing on UI from your distro after the release try Mandrake or Suse ( which work on KDE more ). So, I'd rather see D-BUS working rather than nautilus bug fixing. > Maybe I'm the only one who's > seeing a lot of little niggling things in this distro get the first beta and report them. For minor things, reporting upstream ( to that application's bug tracking system, not Red Hat ) usually works faster. Clear bug reports work faster. Patches even faster ;) All of these will help making a great final release. After that, it's not important anymore. > strategy. Marius suggests that I need to be looking in the Rawhide for > these sorts of things there you'll find new packages if the bug has been fixed at Red Hat, otherwise not. -- Marius Andreiana SoluÅii informatice bazate pe Linux / Linux-based IT solutions www.galuna.ro
[Fedora Users] [Centos Users] [Kernel Development] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat Phoebe Beta] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Discussion] [Gimp] [Stuff] [Yosemite News]