Re: Getting Latest Mozilla RPMs

[Thomas Dodd <ted@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stephen Liu wrote:
> glibc-2.3.2-48.i686.rpm         
> glibc-devel-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
> glibc-common-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm

You should have matchingf version of each.
I'm using the SRPM for mozilla, not rawhide.
I rebuilt the SRPM, with out problems.

As to glibc, I have glibc, glibc-common, glibc-devel, glibc-utils, 
nptl-devel and nscd all 2.3.2-27.9 (on RHL-9) all are i386 except glibc, 
which is i686 (all come for the glibc SRPM).

> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Stephen Liu wrote:
> > > glibc-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
> > > glibc-devel-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
> > > glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.i386.rpm
> > >
> > > glibc-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm
> > > glibc-2.3.2-48.i686.rpm
> > > glibc-devel-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm
> > > glibc-common-2.3.2-48.i386.rpm
> > >
> > > Except "glibc-2.3.2-48.i686.rpm" I could not i686 for other packages.  I
> > > shall use "2.3.2-48.i386" packages.  Are they suitable?

grab the SRPM for glibc and build all the corrct packages?

Trying to mix rawhide and RHL-8.0 is going to be tough.
I'd stiuck with the mozilla.org SRPMS and build localy.
You can try the RPMs from mozilla.org as well, but building you owns is 
best.

Note too that installing a newer mozilla will cause problems with galeon 
if it's installed. I just 'rpm -e galeon' since I never use it.

	-Thomas


--
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list