[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nano editor in Shrike?

To: phoebe-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: nano editor in Shrike?
From: Gerry Tool <gerry@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 19:52:17 -0600
Delivered-to: phoebe-list@listman.redhat.com
List-archive: <https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/phoebe-list/>
List-help: <mailto:phoebe-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: <phoebe-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:phoebe-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list>,<mailto:phoebe-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list>,<mailto:phoebe-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1049074594.2301.25.camel@selene.wodonga.adacel.com.au>
Reply-to: phoebe-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: phoebe-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Michael Wardle wrote:

A number of newbie users seem to prefer nano over vi or emacs, so I'd
like Red Hat to consider once again including nano in its distribution
package set, particularly now that pine and pico are gone.

To get this to be considered, add it as an RFE (request for extension) into bugzilla.redhat.com.

--
gerry
_____
 0/0
 /__

--
Phoebe-list mailing list
Phoebe-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nano editor in Shrike?
  - From: Mike A. Harris
- Re: nano editor in Shrike?
  - From: Michael Wardle

References:
- nano editor in Shrike?
  - From: Michael Wardle

Prev by Date: RE: early review of RH 9 (Shrike)
Next by Date: Re: RHL 9 - concerns
Previous by thread: Re: nano editor in Shrike?
Next by thread: Re: nano editor in Shrike?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Kernel List] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch List] [DVD Store] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]