[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RHL 9 - concerns

On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 10:46, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On 29 Mar 2003, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> >> >I see the main problem with this _INSANE_ lack of binary compability
> >> >development. I mean - we were just starting to compile and test things for
> >> >RHL 8, when we haveto scrap everything again since binary compability is
> >> >broken.. again.
> >> 
> >> What binary incompatibility are you seeing?
> >
> >Programs compiled against libguile aren't compatible.  I haven't found
> >any other specific brokenness yet, except that which can be blamed on
> >the application.
> Hmm.  What is the bugzilla ID for this problem.  I wouldn't mind 
> having a look at it.

Bug number 84990.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Home]     [Kernel List]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch List]     [DVD Store]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux