[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions for anti-.0 folks...



On 25 Mar 2003, Benjamin Vander Jagt wrote:

>I'm not an anti .0 guy, and I'm still unauthoritatively new to Linux in
>general, and I dunno whether ppl will change their minds about 8.1 now
>that it is called 9.0

But it's not called 9.0, it's "Red Hat Linux 9" with no ".0".

>, but I've had troubles with 8.1 itself.

That's impossible as Red Hat has never released a Linux product 
with version "8.1"

Perhaps you mean that you have had trouble with one of the Phoebe 
codenamed beta releases which were version numbered 8.0.9x, 
destined to become Red Hat Linux 9 all along?

<grin>


-- 
Mike A. Harris     ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
Phoebe-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list

[Home]     [Kernel List]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch List]     [DVD Store]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux