Re: Questions for anti-.0 folks...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

Re: Questions for anti-.0 folks...



On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:08:09PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:54:17AM -0800, Joseph Phillips wrote:
> > This debate is insignificant.  Whether called 8.1 or 9, the code is
> > still the same.  So from a logical point of view, this debate is
> > meaningless.
> 
> Unless you listen to what Matt Wilson had to say: the change from x.y
> numbering to just x *is* actually indicative of a major change in the
> overall approach to the distro. That's significant.

But the actual scope of changes from one release to the next will vary
depending on the kinds of developments that are going on in the Open
Source communities, and what kind of development Red Hat wants to
contribute through Red Hat Linux development cycle.  The release
number is really just there to provide an identifier from one release
to the next.

Cheers,

Matt
msw@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Matt Wilson
Manager, Base Operating Systems
Red Hat, Inc.



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
Phoebe-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel List]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]