Re: RHL 9 - concerns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

Re: RHL 9 - concerns



Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:14:05PM -0500, David Krider wrote:

In my mind, there's quite a gap between the $800 and 3-year-lifecycle product and the $100 and 1-year-lifecycle product


FWIW, I'm pretty sure the Enterprise Linux ES has a $349 version with
5 years errata.
See -
  http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/purchase/
  http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/rhlas_errata_policy.html


Hrm. That's... better. Sorry. If they said something about this "basic" version in the announcement, I missed it. And 5 years? Again, I missed it. I thought it was only 3. This is good. No... this is great!


Thanks,
dk






-- Phoebe-list mailing list Phoebe-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel List]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]