VDSO question
- To: redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: VDSO question
- From: vamsi krishna <vamsi.krishnak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:15:21 +0530
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=TxhOS+pbhJ/+8c0/L8QHGElc1yOOTQDwTumlcS7lIQngCyqKcEy77YRb8g287jEa+E4ZAxSqUVjNfmwq3FuJ9Xys4XZixxW5mulflTzI+nZRKAu+2SLLJZfEtQyosdPlVAl9ckj4DyXEhMgF64jEdKYMNwin3pr66K7bKZWRyRU=
- Reply-to: "Red Hat developer's list" <redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hello,
Sorry to interrupt you.
I have a question regarding the vdso option in the kernel boot
parameters. AFAIK if vdso is turned on we would see the following
virtual address mapping in the /proc/<>/maps file [correct me if I'am
wrong]
00:00 0 ffffe000-fffff000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0
so turning off the vdso option should not have this segment mapped
into the virtual memory of the process and hence should not have an
entry in /proc/<>/maps.
For this RHEL machine I see that the vdso option is 0 and still we see
a virtual address mapping of the vdso segment.
Kernel : 2.6.9-11.EL
vdso status : Disabled
/proc/sys/kernel/vdso is 0
so is this /proc entry broken in this version of the kernel ??
PS: I could'nt really figure out in which mailing list we need to post
this, do redhat (RHEL) has a seperate mailing list??
Your kind inputs in this context are greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Vamsi kundeti
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
[Kernel Newbies]
[Red Hat General]
[Fedora]
[Red Hat Install]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Yosemite News]