| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Hi John, > As I recall from when I looked at StackGuard some time ago, 'Canary" is > a technical term in the context of StackGuard. That I am aware of. Problem is how to get rid of the undefined reference. > I suggest you seek help from immunix where you will find people expert > in the use and abuse of StackGuard. I was considering to do that, only their mail forums seem to be filled with no more than spam lately. I had hoped to find some knowledgeable people around here. Anyway, when looking around a bit I naturally stumbled upon the IBM stack protector (ProPolice). Only problem with this is the patches are available for gcc-2.95, gcc-3.2 and gcc-3.3, but not for gcc-2.96rh. I am putting a little effort to get the patch to work with gcc-2.96rh. If it fails I'll have to decide whether to upgrade to RH 9 at last... Bye, Leonard. -- How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste? Stop the use of depleted uranium ammo! End all weapons of mass destruction. _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list