| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
I am no expert with this, but I did some testing with GTK+ and QT and found out that GTK+ was more pthread(native kernel threads) friendly than QT. I could be wrong I only did some preliminary testing/evaluation. On Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:29 PM, Thomas Dodd [SMTP:ted@xxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > > > John wrote: > > My own bias favours KDE over Gnome because > > . I believe C++ a better programming language for this kind of work > > than C. It does more to help programmers avoid silly errors such as > > buffer overruns. > > Are the C++ bindings for gnome? I know GTK+ has GTK--. > > > . I think the recent move in Gnome to this button order in dialogues > > <help> ..... <ok> > > defeats one of the goals espoused in the Gnome standards/guidelines of > > making UIs consistent and easy to use. Older Gnome, KDE, OS/2 and > > Windows has "ok" or equivalent on the viewer's left. > > It believe that, like the buttons in KDE is changable. > see the recent OSNews.com article here > <http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=2997> > > I imagine the GNOME HIG developers had a reason for that placement. > > -Thomas > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list