Re: What about breaking rc.sysint up into an rc.sysinit.d
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 07:19, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> 1) rc.sysinit.d would be created.
> 2) rc.sysinit script would be broken into many small scripts, each with
> a definite purpose.
> ie: the launching setting of networking options would end up being a
> script named rc.sysinit.d/10network.
> 3) rc.sysinit would then simply source each of those scripts in
> numerical order.
> What this would allow is when a third party is building an rpm for
> RedHat, they would not need to have a %pre and %post which patches
> rc.sysinit.
I definitely agree. rc.sysinit is the last BSD-style remnant in a SysV
structure.
The idea behind SysV is to modularize, so that there's no need to edit
critical files, but just create symlinks as needed. Breaking rc.sysinit
into a directory is the logical next step towards a fully modularised
startup mechanism.
--
Florin Andrei
"You can get excited about just any subject if you study it enough.
It's the deep knowledge that makes a topic interesting." - Larry McVoy
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
[Kernel Newbies]
[Red Hat General]
[Fedora]
[Red Hat Install]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Yosemite News]