|
|
|
Re: Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5 | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 08:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Commit fb88c2b changed the security_old_inode_init_security() return > > code for S_PRIVATE inodes. As long as -EOPNOTSUPP is expected, probably > > should revert that as well. > > > > (I'm cc'ing the ocfs2 maintainers.) > > Jan, Joel? Can you confirm? I was planning on doing 3.2 today, but > maybe I can't, or maybe we need to punt this to be a stable patch. > > But maybe we can have quick testing and agreement? Does everybody > agree on both Honza's patch *and* revert of fb88c2b? Does the > EOPNOTSUPP return case match what we used to do? > > Linus > Just clarifying not all of commit fb88c2b, but only the security_old_inode_init_security() hunk. Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux BTRFS] [Linux NFS] [Linux Filesystems] [Ext4 Filesystem] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]
![]() |