Re: Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 08:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Commit fb88c2b changed the security_old_inode_init_security() return
> > code for S_PRIVATE inodes. As long as -EOPNOTSUPP is expected, probably
> > should revert that as well.
> >
> > (I'm cc'ing the ocfs2 maintainers.)
> Jan, Joel? Can you confirm? I was planning on doing 3.2 today, but
> maybe I can't, or maybe we need to punt this to be a stable patch.
> But maybe we can have quick testing and agreement? Does everybody
> agree on both Honza's patch *and* revert of fb88c2b? Does the
> EOPNOTSUPP return case match what we used to do?
>                           Linus

Just clarifying not all of commit fb88c2b, but only the
security_old_inode_init_security() hunk.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Index of Archives]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux