On 07/31/2012 09:25 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:08:55 +0200 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 07/26/2012 04:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> Hi Jens,
>>> the following series makes a number of changes to plugging, moving
>>> common code from md and umem into block, and modifying it to allow
>>> md to get more value out of it.
>>> They've been sitting in -next for a while.
>>> Are you OK with me forwarding them to Linus, or would you rather they
>>> went though your tree?
>>
>> Thanks Neil, looks good. I will apply them to my tree and do some basic
>> testing, too, then push it off for this round (where I haven't pushed
>> out yet).
>>
>
> Thanks Jens,
> However I've just today discovered that the very first patch causes a real
> regression in throughput for RAID5 and while I'm sure I can fix it with a
> subsequent patch (once I figure out exactly what it happening) it might make
> sense to hold them all back for 3.7.
>
> However if you would like to take them now and fix up later (it is only a
> performance regression so it won't really affect bisection) I can work with
> that.
If you're confident we can fix it in this cycle (sounds like it, if you
have a grasp on the situation), then I don't think that should stop us.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Managing RAID on Linux]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device-Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Books]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[AMD 64]
[Linux Networking]