Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust

[Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 24/07/12 07:31, Drew wrote:
> Been mulling this problem over and I keep getting hung up on one
> problem with ECC on a two disk RAID1 setup.
>
> In the event of silent corruption of one disk, which one is the good
> copy?
>
> It works fine if the ECC code is identical across both mirrors. Just
> checksum both chunks and discard the incorrect one.
>
> It also works fine if the ECC codes are corrupted but the data
> chunks are identical. Discard the bad checksum.
>
> What if the corruption goes across several sectors and both data &
> ECC chuncks are corrupted? Now you're back to square one.

I know I'm a bit late to this discussion, and I know very little about
the code level/etc... however, I thought the whole point of the checksum
is to determine that the data + checksum do not match, therefore the
data is wrong and should be discarded. You would re-write the data and
checksum from another source (ie, the other drive in RAID1, or other
drives in RAID5/6 etc...).

ie, it should be treated the same as a bad block / non-readable sector
(or lots of unreadable sectors....)

Regards,
Adam


-- 
Adam Goryachev
Website Managers
www.websitemanagers.com.au


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html