- To: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux RAID <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:30:01 -0500
- In-reply-to: <1897705147.341625.1342995720661.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
Same issue likely.
On 7/22/2012 5:22 PM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
>>> Likewise, if the checksumming you request is implemented in
>>> md/RAID1,
>
> Btw. I like what Roberto proposed ... this could be a completely
> independent layer having it's own device file. MD RAID1 would
> be then built on top of such safe device files. The only thing
> to be implemented directly in the RAID1 would be that immediate
> resyncing in case of discovered read error received from such
> safety layer. And this immediate resyncing could/should be
> optional ...
>
> Jaromir.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Managing RAID on Linux]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device-Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Books]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[AMD 64]
[Linux Networking]