- To: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Re-adding disks to RAID6 in a Fujitsu NAS: old mdadm?
- From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:18:30 +0200
- Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20120629073632.61f529a8@notabene.brown>
- Organization: oops!
- Reply-to: lists@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120606 Thunderbird/13.0
Am 28.06.2012 23:36, schrieb NeilBrown:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:25:44 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger"
> <lists@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What is the logic behind that?
>
> As you have guessed, it first recovered one device, then recovered
> the second one. But it looks like there are no read errors on the
> two good devices, so fear-not.
Good to know.
>> What does it do exactly when it re-adds the first disk, what in
>> the second round?
>>
>> Should I have added sd[ab]3 in one command?
>
> Had you done that with a very new mdadm, it would have recovered
> both at once. mdadm has to say: - disable recovery for now - here
> is one new spare - here is another spare - ok, you can try recovery
> now
>
> otherwise as soon as it gets one spare it will start recovery.
Thanks for the explanation.
>> To me it also seems that I now have good redundancy again
>> already, correct?
>
> Correct. You have single redundancy and in about 10 hours since
> your email you'll have double redundancy.
It is still rebuilding, must have been slowed down by some processes
using the filesystem at night. But still working.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Managing RAID on Linux]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device-Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Books]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[AMD 64]
[Linux Networking]