If rdev became blocked because the unack badblocks, it did not exec
md_wait_for_blocked_rdev in handle_stripe().So the rdev->nr_pending did
not decrease.So rdev did not remove because the wrong nr_pending.
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index d267672..ed63261 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3582,7 +3582,8 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
finish:
/* wait for this device to become unblocked */
- if (conf->mddev->external && unlikely(s.blocked_rdev))
+ if (unlikely(s.blocked_rdev) && (conf->mddev->external ||
+ test_bit(BlockedBadBlocks, &(s.blocked_rdev->flags))))
md_wait_for_blocked_rdev(s.blocked_rdev, conf->mddev);
if (s.handle_bad_blocks)
--
1.7.5.4
?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{炳盯w???塄}?财??j:+v??????2??璀??摺?囤??z夸z罐?+?????w棹f
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Managing RAID on Linux]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device-Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Books]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[AMD 64]
[Linux Networking]