Re: Proposal for metadata version 2.x :)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 06/17/2012 06:12 AM, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
>    Hi! If I understand correctly, one cannot safely switch between 1.x
> metdata layouts since data offsets would be different, right?
> 
>    Why not to overcome this limitation by holding all three metadata
> zones reserved to prevent RAID data allocation inside them? It doesn't
> seem to be significant waste of disk space, but would be more flexible
> indeed.

A very useful property of v1.0 metadata is that the contents start at
the partition start, making Raid1 contents available to bootloaders when
the array isn't running.  That behavior is incompatible with your
suggestion, so your suggestion will be unacceptable to anyone using that
behavior to their advantage.  (Like me.)

Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Managing RAID on Linux]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device-Mapper]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [AMD 64]     [Linux Networking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux