Re: Software RAID checksum performance on 24 disks not even close to kernel reported

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ole Tange <ole@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Don't use CONFIG_MULTICORE_RAID456, we need a different approach.
>> Here you disagree with Brad Campbell and Igor M Podlesny. Can you
>> elaborate why you do not think I should use CONFIG_MULTICORE_RAID456
>> and why you do not think that approach will work?
> Because I wrote the code and it doesn't work the way I want it to [...]

It can hardly be more authoritative than this :-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Managing RAID on Linux]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device-Mapper]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [AMD 64]     [Linux Networking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux