On 5/28/2012 7:56 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 10:33:52 +1000 Jonathan Molyneux
<jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
md1 : active raid6 sde1[0] sdb1[6] sdh1[5] sdc1[4] sdg1[3] sdd1[2] sdf1[1]
7325679680 blocks super 0.91 level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 18
[7/6] [UUUUUU_]
[=========>...........] reshape = 47.0% (689413888/1465135936)
finish=4126.9min speed=3132K/sec
The only thing to do is to wait. This is very much a seek-bound operation
and there is little room for making it go faster.
With SSDs you'd see the throughput of this operation increase by 2
orders of magnitude (100x) or more, as SSDs have application level seek
latency of ~50-80 microseconds, over 100x lower than rotational drives
which are in the 10-30 millisecond range depending on spindle speed.
Of course, cost/GB for the same total storage is 2 to 10 times higher
with SSD. Though interestingly the price of SSDs continues to fall,
whereas the rotational drive manufacturers are currently keeping drive
prices artificially high, between 50-100% higher than last year
depending on drive model, in an effort to recoup apparent financial
losses caused by the flooding in Thailand.
