Re: Hi! Is "container" more efficient in terms of I/O op. numbers ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 25 May 2012 08:14, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 23:30:54 +0800 Igor Podlesny <for.poige+linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>    ... then several "stand-alone" RAIDs on the same HDDs? -- Say, when
>> using write intent bitmaps.
> I'm not sure you question exactly makes sense, but the answer would be "no"
> if it did :-)

   Well, due to disks seeks are expensive, hot data locality is
preferable and valuable thing, isn't it?
   And it makes sense not only for WIB, but other frequent metadata
updates, doesn't it?

End of message. Next message?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Managing RAID on Linux]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device-Mapper]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [AMD 64]     [Linux Networking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux