On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/11/2012 3:16 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
[snip]
> That's the one scenario where I abhor using md raid, as I mentioned. At
> least, a boot raid 1 pair. Using layered md raid 1 + 0, or 1 + linear
> is a great solution for many workloads. Ask me why I say raid 1 + 0
> instead of raid 10.
So, I'm asking - why?
>
> --
> Stan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Best regards,
[COOLCOLD-RIPN]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Managing RAID on Linux]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device-Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Books]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[AMD 64]
[Linux Networking]