On 05/17/2012 07:04 AM, John Robinson wrote:
> On 17/05/2012 14:18, David Brown wrote:
> [...]
>> Theoretically, a 3-disk RAID6 is like a 2-disk RAID5 or a 1-disk RAID1 -
> [...]
>> I can't think of any good reason for it /not/ to support 3-disk
>> RAID6, as there is nothing in the algorithms to hinder it.
>
> I've a vague recollection of Peter Anvin saying the implementation is
> optimised in such a way that it won't work.
>
Yes, it would have required introducing some odd special cases. A
3-disk RAID-6 is bitwise identical to a 3-disk RAID-1, so if Neil wants
to he could add "instant reshaping" support in mdadm (add a disk to a
3-disk RAID-1 turning it into a 4-disk RAID-6; and similar for 2-disk
RAID-1 into 3-disk RAID-5.)
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Managing RAID on Linux]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device-Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Books]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[AMD 64]
[Linux Networking]