|
|
|
Re: Hot-replace for RAID5 | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
|
Hi Neil, Am 11.05.2012 02:50, schrieb NeilBrown:
Doing an in-place reshape with the new 3.3 code should work, though with a softer "should" than above. We will only know that it is "stable" when enough people (such as yourself) try it and report success. If anything does go wrong I would of course help you to put the array back together but I can never guarantee no data loss. You wouldn't be the first to test the code on live data, but you would be the second that I have heard of.
I guess I'll be taking 2nd place then. I just used it on three live raid6 arrays, and it worked perfectly.
Thanks for your all your awesome work! OliverPS: I wasn't subscribed to the list before, so I'm trying to reply to this via gmane. No idea if this preserves all the list headers - if I break the thread, that's probably the cause.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |
![]() |