Re: Hot-replace for RAID5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Hi Neil,

Am 11.05.2012 02:50, schrieb NeilBrown:
Doing an in-place reshape with the new 3.3 code should work, though with a
softer "should" than above.  We will only know that it is "stable" when enough
people (such as yourself) try it and report success.  If anything does go
wrong I would of course help you to put the array back together but I can
never guarantee no data loss.  You wouldn't be the first to test the code on
live data, but you would be the second that I have heard of.

I guess I'll be taking 2nd place then. I just used it on three live raid6 arrays, and it worked perfectly.

Thanks for your all your awesome work!

Oliver

PS: I wasn't subscribed to the list before, so I'm trying to reply to this via gmane. No idea if this preserves all the list headers - if I break the thread, that's probably the cause.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Managing RAID on Linux]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device-Mapper]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [AMD 64]     [Linux Networking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux