- To: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 3.2.4 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:03:21 +0200
- Cc: Paweł Sikora <pluto@xxxxxxxx>, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20120515073219.1275b10a@notabene.brown>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120424 Thunderbird/12.0
On 05/14/12 23:32, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:58:58 +0200 Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> If you post a patch without including a proper commit message and
>> signed-off-by lines, which is standard practice, then that is equivalent
>> to you not having posted a patch in the first place.
>>
>> Don't blame others for not doing the basic work everybody else does when
>> posting patches. It really isn't hard to comply with the standard patch
>> posting rules!
>
> I decided a better approach is just to refresh from upstream:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/cilkplus/include/sha1.h
> http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/cilkplus/libiberty/sha1.c
>
> have been copied into mdadm with just a tiny change to not include config.h
>
> Seems to work, and probably has the *right* fix.
I would tend to agree with you, if not we can hollor at the gcc guys :)
Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Managing RAID on Linux]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device-Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Books]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[AMD 64]
[Linux Networking]