Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] bcache: md conversion

[Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:46:11PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> The consensus from LSF was that bcache need not invent a new interface
> when md and dm can both do the job.  As mentioned in patch 7 this series
> aims to be a minimal conversion.  Other refactoring items like
> deprecating register_lock for mddev->reconfig_mutex are deferred.

Awesome! I just applied the first 6 - the lockdep fix especially was
exactly what I'd been looking for. I need to dig in to the patch that
does the actual md conversion more and play with it... also need to
look at how refcounting works.

> This supports assembly of an already established cache array:
> 
> 	mdadm -A /dev/md/bcache /dev/sd[ab]
> 
> ...will create the /dev/md/bcache container and a subarray representing
> the cache volume.  "Flash-only", or backing-device only volumes were not
> tested.  "Create" support and hot-add/hot-remove come later.
> 
> Note:
> * When attempting to test with small loopback devices (100MB), assembly
>   soft locks in bcache_journal_read().  That hang went away with larger
>   devices, so there seems to be minimum component device size that needs
>   to be considered in the tooling.

Curious. I normally use a 256 mb cache for vm testing and I haven't seen
anything like that in ages, wonder what you found. Will investigate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html