Re: and again: broken RAID5

[John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/05/2012 11:45, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:19:30 +0100 John Robinson
> <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
> > On 10/05/2012 10:20, NeilBrown wrote:
[...]
> > > Just add --force the to --assemble command.
> >
> > I think I'd assemble from only 3 drives, sdh, sdf and sdj, because sdi's
> > event count is so much lower it must be the one that was knocked out
> > first and you probably want to resync onto it (or a fresh drive if it's
> > actually faulty).
>
> correct.  And that is exactly what "mdadm --assemble --force" will decide
> too. :-)
> It will assemble from h, f, j and exclude i.

Ah - I didn't know it was clever enough to do that, I had assumed that 
if you forced all the drives they'd all be marked up-to-date.

What should I do if I had 3 different event counts (like this case) all 
fairly close to each other (unlike this case) and I really did want to 
force them all, avoiding a resync?

Cheers,

John.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html