On 10 May 2012 18:53, Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2012-05-10, Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Frequent array checks are not optional, if you want flush out any UREs
>> in the making, and maximize your odds of successfully rebuilding after
>> a drive replacement. If you are running RAID6 or a triple mirror, with
>> frequent checks, you are very safe.
>
> How frequent do people define as "frequent"? I typically do monthly
> checks, but perhaps I should be doing them weekly.
>
> --keith
>
>
> --
> kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RAID6 on 7 2TB here, weekly checks..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Managing RAID on Linux]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device-Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Books]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[AMD 64]
[Linux Networking]