- To: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Raid1: sdb has a lot mor work then sda
- From: Daniel Spannbauer <ds@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:46:33 +0200
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
Hello,
at the moment I'm trying to find a bottleneck on my lamp-server with
opensuse 11.4 (Kernel 2.6.37.6)
Sometimes the system has a very poor performance because of a high io-wait.
If I watch the systems disk-access with "atop -dD" I can see that sda is
the most of the time at a load of 10%, sdb sometimes is at 100% or
higher at the same time.
In my opinion in a Raid1-System both disk should have nearly the same load.
Or may I wrong whis this?
Both harddisks where changed 3 Weeks ago, /proc/mdstat shows that the
rebuild was successfull and the array is functional. Today I've changed
th SATA-Cable and the Port on the Maindboard of sdb, but the behaviour
is still the same. Both disks passed the extended smart-self-test.
Any ideas about that?
Regards
Daniel
--
Daniel Spannbauer Software Entwicklung
marco Systemanalyse und Entwicklung GmbH Tel +49 8333 9233-27 Fax -11
Rechbergstr. 4 - 6, D 87727 Babenhausen Mobil +49 171 4033220
http://www.marco.de/ Email ds@xxxxxxxx
Geschäftsführer Martin Reuter HRB 171775 Amtsgericht München
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Managing RAID on Linux]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device-Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Books]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[AMD 64]
[Linux Networking]