Re: Is this enough for us to have triple-parity RAID?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hi Peter,

> Perhaps it was not clear that "use self repairing coding
> similarly to Parchive" does not mean the same as "use Parchive".

sorry, I understood you meant storing somewhere
files with parities.

> Applying self repairing coding to RAID might be easier to
> imagine considering of a RAID volume as a directory of
> stripe-sized files.

Exactly, but as far as I know this is the same as
any N parities RAID.

I mean, the mathematics and algorithm behind should
be exactly the same...



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Managing RAID on Linux]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device-Mapper]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [AMD 64]     [Linux Networking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux