[PATCH 3 of 5] DM RAID: Use safe version of rdev_for_each

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fix segfault caused by using rdev_for_each instead of rdev_for_each_safe

Commit dafb20fa34320a472deb7442f25a0c086e0feb33 mistakenly replaced a safe
iterator with an unsafe one when making some macro changes.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>

Index: linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
--- linux-upstream.orig/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm
 	int ret;
 	unsigned redundancy = 0;
 	struct raid_dev *dev;
-	struct md_rdev *rdev, *freshest;
+	struct md_rdev *rdev, *tmp, *freshest;
 	struct mddev *mddev = &rs->md;
 	switch (rs->raid_type->level) {
@@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm
 	freshest = NULL;
-	rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
+	rdev_for_each_safe(rdev, tmp, mddev) {
 		if (!rdev->meta_bdev)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Managing RAID on Linux]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device-Mapper]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [AMD 64]     [Linux Networking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux