Re: [PATCH] md/raid1:using else-if instead if.

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 03/31/2012 07:29 PM, majianpeng wrote:
> From 798f3fce3d077db049a44d0d2434261c937796e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:23:56 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] md/raid1:using else-if instead if.
> 
> Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid1.c |    3 +--
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index 4a40a20..a9de970 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -2024,8 +2024,7 @@ static void handle_sync_write_finished(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio
>  		if (test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags) &&
>  		    test_bit(R1BIO_MadeGood, &r1_bio->state)) {
>  			rdev_clear_badblocks(rdev, r1_bio->sector, s);
> -		}
> -		if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags) &&
> +		} else if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags) &&
>  		    test_bit(R1BIO_WriteError, &r1_bio->state)) {
>  			if (!rdev_set_badblocks(rdev, r1_bio->sector, s, 0))
>  				md_error(conf->mddev, rdev);

It would be even better to:

if (test_bit(BIO_UPDATE, &bio->bi_flags)) {
	if (test_bit(R1BIO_MadeGood, &r1_bio->state))
  			rdev_clear_badblocks(rdev, r1_bio->sector, s);
} else {
	if (test_bit(R1BIO_WriteError, &r1_bio->state)) {
	...


... rather than testing the bit twice.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html