Re: [PATCH 00/11] Various cleanups and minor fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/20/12 22:11, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:54:05 +0100 Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>> From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> This patch set implements a number of smaller cleanups, as well as
>> fixing a couple of cases where we don't zero out the full buffer we
>> just obtained via malloc.
> 
> All applied and push out - thanks.  There were a few conflict which some
> stuff I was working on, but nothing serious.

Excellent, thanks!

>> The most controversial is probably patch 06 which caches the device
>> block size for aligned read/writes in super1.c to avoid calling the
>> ioctl() on each write.
> 
> Yeah, it's a bit ugly, but seems reasonable.

Yeah, I was trying to find the cleanest way of doing it. I am
contemplating whether it makes sense to try and push this up the stack,
but I figured starting out small like this would be better.

> I think it might be nearly time for 3.2.4.  Do you have any thoughts about
> that?

I think it would be a good time - I have found it relatively quiet on
the bug report front since the 3.2.3 update, so jumping to 3.2.4 sounds
good.

Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux