Re: Re: md:Add break if find.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Thansk,I know.

------------------				 
kedacomkernel
2012-03-14

-------------------------------------------------------------
发件人:NeilBrown
发送日期:2012-03-14 10:06:35
收件人:majianpeng
抄送:linux-raid
主题:Re: md:Add break if find.

On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:28:12 +0800 "majianpeng" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >From 6e04c2374db7fc34ccbf9f37f85e735a349c816c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:26:25 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] md:Add break if find.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid5.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 360f2b9..e05d9e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -4369,8 +4369,10 @@ static inline sector_t sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int
>  	 * recovery aborts.
>  	 */
>  	for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++)
> -		if (conf->disks[i].rdev == NULL)
> +		if (conf->disks[i].rdev == NULL) {
>  			still_degraded = 1;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  
>  	bitmap_start_sync(mddev->bitmap, sector_nr, &sync_blocks, still_degraded);
>  

Thanks - however I don't think I'll apply this one.

It is a micro optimisation which only improve an uncommon case a little,
but it makes the source code long and the generated machine code longer (by
32 bytes on x86_64).
So I don't really think it is a win.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{炳盯w???塄}?财??j:+v??????2??璀??摺?囤??z夸z罐?+?????w棹f



[ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Managing RAID on Linux]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device-Mapper]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [AMD 64]     [Linux Networking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux