Re: Direct disk access on IBM Server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/04/11 16:05, Majed B. wrote:
Hello,

I've setup a bunch of software RAID boxes and I've had my main one
running at a friend's place with about 16 disks and 9TB of data.

One time 2 disks had bad sectors and things took a bad turn. It was a
RAID5 array, so I had to salvage everything I could rather than losing
everything we had there (no backups). It took me about 3 weeks of
working daily for about 6 hours a day in cloning disks, recovering
files and validating checksums. It was not fun at all.


There's good reason for recommending raid6 for such large arrays!

I really hope Neil (or someone else) gets the chance to implement the features in the md roadmap - once md supports bad block lists, bad blocks on a disk will no longer mean the whole disk is removed. So in situations like yours, unless you have bad sectors at the same place on two drives, all your data will be intact - and the huge majority will still be redundant, giving you time to do a simple disk replacement.

If you have critical data, I'd suggest you add a battery and an
sd-card/flash card to your hardware RAID array. At least if the power
goes off, whatever is in the cache will be written to the card and
later on to the disks when power is restored.

A UPS will not help you if your power supply decides to commit seppuku.


That's true, of course. But protecting data is always a matter of minimising the risks and consequences of the more likely failures. My power supply /could/ fail, but I don't see it as a likely case. With a good UPS and some redundancy in the disks, by far the most likely cause of failure is human error (someone deleting the wrong file, for instance). Still, I will be checking the price of a backup battery for the server.

If you keep daily backups, or any form of backups, go ahead with
software RAID and keep yourself free from vendor lock.


I do have daily backups - raid doesn't prevent /all/ data loss!

mvh.,

David


Regards,

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:36 PM, David Brown<david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 21/04/11 08:24, Stan Hoeppner wrote:

David Brown put forth on 4/20/2011 7:21 AM:

It's true that boot loaders and software raid can be an awkward
combination.

...

Yes, it's a few extra steps.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux