Re: Benchmarks: Linux Kernel RAID vs a Hardware RAID setup | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 05:18:46PM +1200, Richard Scobie wrote: > Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > >My understanding tho, is that the IO output and input figures are on > >sequential IO. There are no figures on random IO, > > If you look at some results Justin posted: > > http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20080707/veliciraptors_with_x4.html > > The column "Random Create" shows performance for randomly creating, > reading and deleting 16384 files sized between 16bytes and 1MB > distributed randomly through 64 directories (this is the -n parameter > and is shown in the "Num Files" column.) Yes, but these are not random IO in the sense that I meant it, which was unclear. These are specific system calls, delete, and seeks, with some IO on the inodes and maybe releasing blocks to the empty block list. I meant to say: There are no tests in bonnie++ that measures random read and write thruput. best regards keld -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home] [ATA RAID] [Linux] [Managing RAID on Linux] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device-Mapper] [Kernel] [Linux Books] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [Photos] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [AMD 64] [Linux Nework]
![]() |